Back In (or On) Shape

I want to revisit the discussion about vehicle shapes, because yet again, I read in a car magazine the oft-repeated moan about people choosing crossovers/SUVs to drive instead of "real" cars. I suppose the argument is that cars, being lower to the ground, are "better" to drive, on account of their being able to corner faster than crossovers, which ride a little higher.
But buying a car isn't just about g-forces around corners - it is a far more complex decision than that, being both practical & emotional. Some people really do need a vehicle with lots of seats for the family, but others, like us, really just look for front seat comfort along with some carrying space in case it's needed.
The trend towards SUV appearances is really a reversion towards a more practical layout of cars & away from the lower, knees-in-your-face set up that too many cars deliver.

Here is an example of the hypocrisy of motor journalists. BMW X6, like the Infiniti QX70 is much denigrated in automotive magazines because of its silhouette curving down at the rear instead of the square box back end that conventional crossovers display. Here's a picture of a popular SUV, the Chevrolet Equinox followed by an image of the BMW X6. You'll observe that while there is less room in the back for things like, say, furniture there's not much difference ahead of the B pillars. In the front where most people sit. After all, how often do you see these vast, 3 row SUVs actually full of people? Hardly ever, mostly it's just the driver, & companion. Very often, it's just a solitary driver.
Now see the Honda Accord Coupe - see how low it is? So I say "why shouldn't people want a graceful silhouette, along with a small amount of hatch space and a slightly higher point of access, instead of sitting almost on the ground & also having very limited storage space, for those rare occasions when a large box is carried?"
And finally, see the last photograph. It's a 1938 Chrysler, I think. Guess what? The fundamental layout is just the same as the QX70 or X6 - a rear-wheel drive layout & a curved back end that is both graceful & reasonably roomy aft of the driver. Of course there is significant difference in how the engine surroundings are shaped, & the windshield is more vertical than nowadays, but after that...not much difference. You sit higher than in a modern road car & the vehicle shape is not compromised by pretending it's a full-blown minibus or hauler of goods.There are specialised vehicles for that, but a nod in that direction can be useful.

And Then It Was Summer

In lovely British Columbia by the sea, summers are reliably dry & warm. Something which surprised us on moving here 4 years ago. We'd expected the West Coast's reputation for rain to persist all year, but instead, for perhaps 5 months, we get very little rain. So little, in fact, that water restrictions are usually in place by July.
It seemed a waste to drive around in an enclosed car, even with the sunroof open, as we were doing. And so, towards the end of a hot, sunny summer, my eye was magically directed towards a sports car. A real "sports car", not a "sporting" car like a Mustang or Camaro.
It only stood out from the other cars in the used car lot because of the lovely orange paint, & because it was mounted on a ramp to show off the elegant lines.
I really didn't know very much about the Nissan 350Z, except that it was the same rear wheel drive platform that our Infiniti was based on known as FM by Nissan, meaning "Front Midship". By this they mean the car is rear wheel drive based with the engine in the front but being pushed back as close to the middle as possible, thereby allowing the wheels to go ahead of the engine. This gives both more foot room, as a narrow inline engine takes up less side to side space than a transversely mounted one, as well as more even weight distribution. Even in a V-shaped 6 cylinder engine, the actual block is much narrower than the top - see this photo on the left:

If the engine were turned around transversely, all those cylinders lined up would take up much more room, which is what happens in front-wheel-drive cars - they sacrifice some "spare" width of the engine area to gain it in the longitudinal area. Space is saved, but at the expense of a little foot room. Following this philosophy, Nissan's Infiniti brand emulated that of BMW.  That orange colour is lovely,isn't it?

But, I thought, it was a coupe, not a "proper" open sports car like the 1972 MGB that I'd once shared with my ex. Still, I took that car for a decent spin around the area & was very impressed. The manual gearbox was a delight, the seats were quite comfortable & the engine, the same VQ350 as in older Infiniti FX35s, was a beautifully sounding delight. So I checked around. And found a lovely, low mileage, 2004 Roadster in terrific shape. And as well, equipped with almost everything - including navigation & lovely leather seats. These latter were a trifle worn, but I put that down to patina! The engine is the same as in the FX35 - a CUV replaced by the FX37 we had before. This model sold for almost twice the price of the base coupe! This is it here - yes, we bought it! I know, it isn't that lovely orange paint, but apart from that...it's perfect! The actual colour is named as grey, not silver, but there's not much difference between the 2 cars we have when set next to each other.
This Z car just aches to be taken out on the winding roads of Vancouver Island & has even been across the mountains into the desert-like interior of the province.

Talking About Shape

I mentioned in an earlier post my thoughts on the trade-offs that accompany front-wheel-drive cars. But there are undoubtedly benefits, too, those being more cabin room resulting from the absence of the rear drive train & differential. Usually too, the engine is mounted transversely instead of inline with the drive direction, allowing what might be called a "cab forward" design.
But I cannot see the advantage in a fwd platform being adapted, as most good machines are nowadays, to four-wheel-drive. If you have to have drive to the back wheels, that power must come along the passenger space to the back axle, thereby negating one of the main benefits of front wheel drive.
I have 2 main objections to the prevailing fwd layout in most cars - the first is the possibility of torque steer, which I observed directly in the Audi 80, despite its modest power, & also the lack of foot room in the front which arises from the space that a transverse engine consumes by the way it is mounted in the car. In every fwd car I've driven it seems to me that the pedals are too close to the driver because the wheel arches intrude. They have to because the transverse engine mounting places the engine ahead of the front axle. So the wheels arches have to move back. Observe the layout in these pictures of older cars - the A pillar - the pillar surrounding the windshield is more vertical than a modern car admittedly, but look at the angles - see how the pillars are aimed behind the front axle. The front wheels are not intruding into the driver's foot space.
Now look at this picture of a competing Lexus RX350. The A pillar is aimed in front of the wheels, which means that the wheel arches will intrude an amount. This is one reason why "prestige" car manufacturers like Mercedes, BMW & Jaguar, (& of course Bentley & Rolls Royce) stick to rear-wheel-drive. See in the older cars here - a green Pontiac & grey Alvis - there is distance between the leading edge of the front door & the wheels? That used to be space where your feet went, but now, as below that space has been consumed in the interest of "package efficiency". Meaning that although the overall vehicle is smaller for its given passenger space, it comes at a price.

In yet another photo of the QX70, it's easy to see the different approaches - the A pillar of the Infiniti is aimed behind the front axle, giving a reasonable amount of space between the leading edge of the door & the wheel - despite those wheels being 21" in diameter!
Certainly there's more back seat space & more room behind the driver to carry stuff - the Acura MDX, which is about the same overall length as the QX70S - even has 3 rows of seats! Why on earth would an older couple need all that? In fact, I have never seen these CUVs with 3 rows carrying any more than just a couple in the front. Should any prospective purchaser really need seating space for 6 or 7 people, my thoughts are that they instead buy a minivan.

Satisfaction, At Last

Or at least as close to it as I've ever been. No, it wasn't the Jag, but it might have if this hadn't been the first year of the F Pace on the Canadian market (which meant that there were no significant discounts available). And being a new model, the Jag revealed the latest technology - digital displays in bright colours that changed according to activity - for example, when using the sat-nav, which was a giant 10 inch display in the middle of the facia in normal driving - as you approached a turn or your destination the display was also put right in front of you instead, or beside the normal speedometer/rev counter! I liked that very much as it meant you could look at the road ahead at the same time!
The salespeople were very urbane & it seemed like we were being interviewed before being allowed to drive the car. In fact, we spent over half an hour talking about how much aluminium was used in manufacture, engine options & power, manufacturing processes & so forth that we began to wonder if we'd ever get to actually drive one! And when we did, well, it was a bit of an anticlimax! The car drove well, had a fancy gear selector thing that was flush in the centre facia until the car was started, upon when it glided up into your hand, was nicely responsive...but, apart from the electronics, wasn't any better in any way I could observe than the comparatively old-fashioned QX70S that we'd just driven. We certainly liked it better than the much vaunted Audi Q5 - whose dealership, by the way, was very downmarket compared to the others. And I felt reassured that we hadn't lusted after the very expensive Porsche Macan, which was, after all, a tarted-up Q5. In fact, in discussions with the Sales Manager - yes, we got that far - he volunteered that the Audi wasn't in the same class as the Jaguar, & by implication, the QX70S.
But then we got into the various trim & engine levels. To get a petrol engine (not a diesel), seats of same quality, & a couple of other things we'd be looking at $70,000! Ouch! Way out of our price range. And there weren't any demos available to soften the blow.  So it was back, again, to the Infiniti salesman, who, while we'd been away, had been asked to think of the very best price they could offer. And they came up with a price that was too good to pass up - we were presented with a lovely silver & black car & offered a 20% discount!  The S in the model name, picked out in red in the name on the back, meant attractive 21" wheels, purple stitching in the upgraded leather seating, a sunroof, navigation as well as a surround camera which gives a very helpful picture in the display due to cameras under the wing mirrors, in the grille & in the hatch lid, which combine all the picture to give you the all-around view.

As well, there are paddle shifters around the leather-wrapped & purple stitched steering wheel, so selecting the right gear is just a flick of the wrist away.
Interestingly, despite the 3" larger diameter wheels, I thought the ride was slightly more comfortable & found out that was due to adaptive dampers which the base model didn't have.
I should say here that one other aspect attracted me to Infiniti & that was the straightforward way the models were presented. There was very little of  the "start with the base car, & then add on thousands more in options" approach of BMW & Audi. Instead, you have a couple of choices & that's it. So you don't get sucked into spending more than you can afford.

Here's the car we bought.

Don't you agree it's a lovely looking car? Admittedly, it doesn't have the roomy back half that the F Pace has, but we are only a couple - our children are grown & live on the other side of the continent - so our needs are concentrated more on the front seating areas. Of course, it has way more power than we need - 325 HP - but it's nice to have!
It is a very traditional sporting car, despite being shaped like an SUV.  The driver & passenger sit exactly midway between the wheelbase for the best weight distribution, & Apple phone is not part of the deal.